For teams evaluating an alternative to InformaIT, understanding the key differences in capabilities is essential for pharmaceutical, medical device, and life sciences companies where the stakes couldn’t be higher.
Many organizations currently using InformaIT's content comparison tools are at a crossroads. While InformaIT offers basic text verification capabilities with AI-powered OCR, they’re not extending AI to other areas of their platform. Growing regulatory demands and complex packaging requirements have teams exploring alternatives that provide more comprehensive, future-ready inspection capabilities.
Why Teams Explore InformaIT Alternatives
Searching for better inspection tools often starts when review cycles slow down, threatening time to market deadlines. As both digital content and packaging becomes more complex amid evolving regulations, text-only tools can’t keep up. FDA, EMA, and internal compliance standards now require verification of text content, layout, graphics, fonts, symbols, and complete packaging structure.
InformaIT text verification centers on comparing text, but its design doesn’t account for how teams actually inspect packaging. Reviews often involve jumping between separate tools to check graphics, barcodes, and layout. Each element requires a different process, slowing things down and adding friction that can create costly delays for teams managing high volumes or tight deadlines. Some teams say InformaIT’s OCR generates so many false positives that it drags out reviews and makes it harder to trust what the system flags.
Many quality teams rely on visual QA platforms to review multilingual packaging content, complex artwork, and regulatory elements. InformaIT integrates with platforms like Veeva and Esko, which cover many standard use cases. Still, some teams end up managing separate systems for artwork approval workflows and quality control, especially when full API access or automation is unavailable. When content has to be moved manually, especially in high-volume environments, review processes become slower and more error-prone. As inspection volume increases, switching between tools adds pressure and creates delays. This setup can lead to regulatory labeling errors, and compliance issues. Support and training also create challenges. Some North American teams have reported slow response times. When onboarding takes too long or staff turnover occurs, knowledge transfer becomes harder. Time spent retraining users often takes away from time that could be used to improve inspection outcomes. Users often describe the interface as frustrating, especially during onboarding, where training feels slower and more difficult than it should be.
As compliance expectations increase, quality teams must provide clear audit trails, detailed validation documentation, and reliable quality system integration. InformaIT’s focus on text makes it harder to meet these needs. This has led many teams to look for alternatives that support audit-ready QA and align with modern regulatory requirements.
What InformaIT Does Well
Despite its limitations, InformaIT remains a solid choice for certain teams. InformaIT Text Compare is especially useful for pharma documents, where catching minor text differences matters. The tool compares content character by character to flag even the most minor changes between versions. When working with regulatory submissions, package inserts, or text-heavy materials, its focused approach helps maintain version accuracy for compliance requirements.
The platform has found its place in established processes, particularly in niche workflows where straightforward text comparison satisfies minimum compliance requirements. Some teams stick with InformaIT because they know it well. When verification needs stay consistent, that familiarity can feel more valuable than switching to something new.
For quality groups with targeted inspection needs, InformaIT offers a focused solution. Its straightforward approach works well for organizations with basic verification tasks or limited scope requirements. When text comparison meets fundamental quality control needs, the platform delivers sufficient functionality without the additional features of more comprehensive solutions.
Where InformaIT Falls Short
While offering basic text verification, InformaIT exhibits several critical limitations that impact its effectiveness as a comprehensive quality control solution:
- No full-feature visual inspection capabilities:
While InformaIT offers text comparison capabilities, teams now need platforms that can verify everything on the packaging - text, graphics, barcodes, and even braille. Regulatory reviewers aren’t just reading, they’re validating how key elements appear visually, from dosage displays to warning icons. Tools that lack full visual inspection put teams at risk of overlooking critical packaging elements.
- Absence of integrated barcode and braille inspection:
InformaIT users often rely on separate processes or add-ons for barcode and braille verification, which adds friction to end-to-end QA. This modular structure can create additional process steps for quality teams that need to verify all packaging elements, potentially extending review cycles for complex packaging components.
- Poor scalability for multi-market or multi-language packaging:
When working with text-focused verification tools, quality teams handling complex inspection requirements often encounter efficiency challenges. Organizations managing products across different markets face unique challenges with varied content types, multiple languages, and diverse formatting requirements. Alternative platforms designed specifically for these complex scenarios typically offer better efficiency for teams supporting global product lines.
- Gaps in compliance traceability and audit readiness:
Regulatory agencies expect more complete quality records than ever before. As FDA, EMA, and other bodies tighten requirements, companies must track processes closely, document thoroughly, and connect their verification systems with existing quality tools. Teams managing complex quality assurance programs often look for solutions that anticipate rather than react to regulatory developments.
Why GlobalVision is the Modern Alternative
GlobalVision’s Verify gives teams what text-only tools can't: an all-in-one inspection platform that verifies packaging at every level - text, layout, graphics, barcodes, braille, and even color - across regulatory documents, IFUs, and print-ready packaging files. As a SaaS quality control platform, it integrates directly with your preferred artwork management systems and prepress quality platforms to simplify workflows. Verify supports artwork approval workflows, automated proofreading, and document version control, all within a single system. Its advanced inspection engine identifies meaningful differences while filtering out irrelevant variations, allowing reviewers to focus on what matters.
Quality teams benefit from Verify's unified approach that combines multiple inspection technologies together in one straightforward workflow. Instead of juggling separate tools for different elements, reviewers can verify text, graphics, barcodes, and braille simultaneously, cutting inspection time while improving accuracy.
Teams get up to speed faster with Verify's practical onboarding process and training resources. Cloud deployment accelerates implementation with minimal IT effort, making it particularly valuable for distributed teams or organizations with strict internal validation requirements.
From consumer products to pharma, medical devices, and printing, companies in regulated industries use Verify. Its widespread adoption by many sectors proves it handles quality control effectively, regardless of product type or regulatory framework.
For security and compliance requirements, Verify delivers the comprehensive audit trails, validation documentation, and security controls that regulatory authorities demand. As a leading life sciences compliance tech, its alignment with FDA, EMA, and GMP standards is backed by ISO certifications for information security (27001) and quality management (9001:2015). The platform's built-in validation documentation simplifies 21 CFR Part 11 compliance efforts and accelerates regulatory inspections, giving teams audit-ready QA that meets modern compliance standards.
What to Look for in an InformaIT Replacement
When evaluating alternatives to InformaIT, success depends on finding solutions that address your specific quality control challenges while providing flexibility for future growth. Select platforms like Verify that tackle real quality control challenges. Unlike InformaIT, Verify accelerates inspections, precisely identifies errors, and handles all content types within a single system.
Quality control must cover every stage of content development, starting with the first draft and continuing to final packaging design. You need tools that manage both your regulated text and visual packaging elements within one system. While InformaIT struggles with visual elements, Verify excels at integrated inspection capabilities that verify text, graphics, barcodes, and braille together, rather than relying on disconnected tools for different elements.
Error prevention in print packaging delivers far more value than correcting issues downstream. In regulated industries, packaging errors caught during development might cost hundreds to fix, while post-production errors can escalate into millions through recalls, rework, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Verify integrates with your existing content workflows to catch issues during development, protect budgets, timelines, and reduce compliance risks that InformaIT might miss.
Your verification platform should grow with your quality requirements. When you add users, expand to new regions, or launch more product lines, your system must support content QA at scale without creating bottlenecks or compromising validation integrity. Unlike InformaIT’s language limitations, Verify supports global needs including Arabic, Chinese, and dozens of other languages. Look for software with clear user management, defined permission structures, and deployment options compatible with your IT infrastructure. Equally important are the validation documentation and implementation resources determining how quickly your teams can adopt and master the platform, particularly in highly regulated environments.
Balancing thoroughness with efficiency ultimately determines the success of your quality control program. You still need thorough inspections, but smarter processes save time. Today's inspection technology automates routine checks so your specialists can focus on complex, high-risk content where expert judgment matters most, an area where InformaIT falls short.
Discover Why More Teams Are Choosing GlobalVision
Organizations looking to overcome InformaIT's limitations find that GlobalVision Verify delivers more comprehensive and efficient quality assurance. See how Verify transforms proofreading into a true quality advantage.
